← All claims

Supplements · Diets

exogenous ketones improves cardiac output

In plain terms: Can drinking ketones help the heart pump better?

Leans support Supplements 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: 🧪 exogenous ketones

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.50

Yes in heart-failure patients, but trials are short, from one group, and measure performance not survival.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-15

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

14 support 2 contradict 3 tested null 2 mixed · 21 sources, 16 independent groups · 1 superseded — pooled inside a review, counted once

What the evidence shows

Exogenous ketones acutely raise cardiac output and myocardial efficiency in heart failure (HCA2-mediated) - the best clinical ketone signal. But short-term, surrogate endpoints (not mortality), and essentially one research group (Aarhus).

The evidence (22)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Chevli
2026 · J Am Heart Assoc
observational tested-null low UK Biobank: higher circulating ketone bodies associated with incident CV outcomes/mortality - endogenous KB are a stress marker, not a benefit signal
Horsdal
2025 · Basic Res Cardiol
animal supports high Blinded crossover in porcine cardiogenic shock: 3-OHB increased cardiac output and contractility
Selvaraj
2025 · JACC Heart Fail
RCT supports moderate [FT-verified] KETO-HFpEF 2025 crossover n=20 resting CO +0.6 L/min though peak VO2 null; independent group
Solis-Herrera
2025 · Diabetes
RCT supports high Independent group: graded beta-OHB infusion dose-dependently raised cardiac output, LVEF and stroke volume in T2DM+HF; NaHCO3 control negative
Berg-Hansen K et al] # corrected 2026-08-17 from PubMed; was [(HFrEF 14-day)
2024 · (RCT)
RCT supports moderate 14-day oral ketone-ester n=24 HFrEF resting CO 5.2 vs 5.0 L/min lower wedge pressure
Tominec D et al
2025 · study_type: RCT
RCT contradicts high RCT, n=33 healthy adults (IEK n=16 vs placebo n=17), ketone monoester ingestion during high-altitude acclimatization; altitude increased cardiac output similarly in both groups (P=0.529-0.828) — no ketone effect on cardiac output.
Seto
2025 · Physiol Rep
RCT tested-null moderate Independent crossover RCT in healthy young adults: acute ketone monoester did not change resting/stress HR, BP, blood flow or sympathetic activity
Lyhne
2025 · Intensive Care Med Exp
animal tested-null moderate 3-OHB increased cardiac output and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance in porcine pulmonary embolism
Crabtree CD et al
2025 · study_type: RCT
observational supports moderate Placebo-controlled acute cardiac MRI study, n=21 healthy adults (BH-BD n=11 vs placebo n=10); BH-BD raised R-BHB to 2.1mM, CO increased +31% (p<0.001) via +SV and +HR, myocardial blood flow +29%; placebo showed no change.
Siddiqi
2026 · World J Crit Care Med
meta-analysis supports moderate SR/MA of RCTs: ketone-body supplementation improved cardiac output and LVEF in heart-failure patients (emerging, limited evidence)
Kodur N et al
2025 · study_type: observational
observational supports low State-of-the-art narrative review: multiple small short-term clinical trials show exogenous ketone supplementation may improve myocardial function across HF manifestations, though long-term data lacking.
Aromiwura AA et al
2025 · study_type: observational
observational supports low Narrative (non-systematic) review of myocardial perfusion regulation; concludes ketone bodies improve myocardial blood flow/ejection fraction in healthy subjects and beneficially affect cardiac output and filling pressures in decompensated
Seefeldt
2024 · Sci Rep
animal mixed moderate 3-OHB raised cardiac output via stroke volume but caused inotropy-resistant vasoplegia in transplant
Sun Q et al
2025 · study_type: animal
animal contradicts moderate Mouse HFpEF model; 6-week ketone ester (1,3-butanediol) or empagliflozin supplementation restored myocardial ketone oxidation rates but was NOT associated with improvement in cardiac function.
Challa AA et al
2025 · study_type: observational
observational supports moderate Narrative review of ketone bodies' vascular effects; cites small clinical studies showing exogenous ketone administration to HF patients reduces systemic vascular resistance and improves myocardial function, plus increased coronary blood fl
Shrestha S et al
2026 · study_type: observational
observational supports moderate Narrative review of ketone biology in cardiovascular health/disease; discusses ketones' effects on cardiac metabolic/structural remodeling and signaling (beta-hydroxybutyrylation), citing preclinical and early clinical benefit in HF.
Mohib
2025 · Nutrients
RCT supports moderate Systematic review: exogenous ketosis acutely improved hemodynamics/cardiac output among the most consistent clinical benefits in disease
Crabtree CD et al
2025 · study_type: observational
observational supports low Narrative review: nutritional ketosis acutely elevates cardiac output and myocardial perfusion in healthy and CVD subjects in a dose-dependent manner; effect durable up to 14 days; no long-term studies performed.
Gupta A et al
2026 · medRxiv
meta-analysis supports high Systematic review + random-effects meta-analysis of 8 RCTs (oral ketones/infusions vs placebo) in HF/cardiometabolic-risk adults. Exogenous ketones increased CO (MD +1.11 L/min, 95%CI 0.55-1.67), LVEF, and SV, decreased PCWP.
Nielsen R, et al.
2019 · Circulation
RCT supports moderate Landmark crossover n=16 HFrEF 3-OHB raised CO +2.0 L/min P<.001 via SV+HR; LVEF +8% acute
↩ SUPERSEDED — pooled in the review above, counted once
Gouwens
2025 · Circ Res
animal mixed moderate Independent group: enhancing cardiac ketone-body oxidation improved exercise performance/cardiac function in mice
Bech
2025 · Sci Rep
animal supports moderate Hyperpolarized-MRS pig study: beta-3-OHB infusion increased cardiac output (1.9 to 3.8 L/min) and heart rate

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.