← All claims

Supplements · Diets

Can drinking ketones help the heart pump better?

The claim, precisely: exogenous ketones improves cardiac output

Strong support Supplements
RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.93

Yes in heart-failure patients, but trials are short, from one group, and measure performance not survival.

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: Human trials (RCT / n-of-1)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

6 support 0 contradict 0 tested null 1 mixed · 5 sources, 3 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Exogenous ketones acutely raise cardiac output and myocardial efficiency in heart failure (HCA2-mediated) - the best clinical ketone signal. But short-term, surrogate endpoints (not mortality), and essentially one research group (Aarhus).

The evidence (7)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Selvaraj
2025 · JACC Heart Fail
RCT supports moderate [FT-verified] KETO-HFpEF 2025 crossover n=20 resting CO +0.6 L/min though peak VO2 null; independent group
Nielsen R, et al.
2019 · Circulation
RCT supports moderate HFrEF: dose-dependent rise in cardiac output & myocardial efficiency
(HFrEF 14-day)
2024 · (RCT)
RCT supports moderate 14-day oral ketone-ester n=24 HFrEF resting CO 5.2 vs 5.0 L/min lower wedge pressure
(HFrEF 14-day)
2024 · (RCT)
RCT supports moderate HFrEF 14-day RCT: improved resting + exercise hemodynamics
Lyhne
2025 · Intensive Care Med Exp
animal supports moderate 3-OHB increased cardiac output and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance in porcine pulmonary embolism
Seefeldt
2024 · Sci Rep
animal mixed moderate 3-OHB raised cardiac output via stroke volume but caused inotropy-resistant vasoplegia in transplant
Nielsen R, et al.
2019 · Circulation
RCT supports moderate Landmark crossover n=16 HFrEF 3-OHB raised CO +2.0 L/min P<.001 via SV+HR; LVEF +8% acute

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.