← All claims

Metabolic & Cardiometabolic · Gut & Microbiome

FFAR2 activation increases L-cell GLP-1 secretion

Insufficient Metabolic & Cardiometabolic 🐭 Non-human evidence
RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 1.00
⚖️ Thin evidence — read the needle loosely. The score shows which way the studies lean, but there are too few independent, high-quality ones to place it firmly. Expect this to move as better evidence arrives.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-08-11

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: A plausible theory (Mechanism)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

1 support 0 contradict 0 tested null 0 mixed · 1 sources, 1 independent group

What the evidence shows

The receptor step H1 depends on. FFAR2 on enteroendocrine L-cells does mediate GLP-1 and PYY release in response to SCFA — the receptor works. That is a different claim from H1's, and the difference is where H1 actually lives. H1 asserts that AhR-driven FFAR2 upregulation makes L-cells more sensitive to a given SCFA load.

The evidence (1)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
?
2026 · study_type: mechanism
mechanism supports low Review of gut-derived incretin modulation describing FFAR2/GPR43 on L-cells as a route by which microbial SCFA drive GLP-1 secretion.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.