← All claims

Food Contaminants

high-pesticide-residue produce decreases sperm count

In plain terms: Does eating pesticide-heavy fruit and veg lower your sperm count?

Insufficient Food Contaminants πŸ”¬ Includes disconfirming

Part of: πŸ” pesticides in food

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.00
βš–οΈ Thin evidence β€” read the needle loosely. The score shows which way the studies lean, but there are too few independent, high-quality ones to place it firmly. Expect this to move as better evidence arrives.

One study found a striking drop, but nobody independent has ever replicated it, the same team's second population showed nothing, and no man's actual pesticide level was measured. Independent research finds more produce means better sperm quality. Eat the fruit and veg.

πŸ“… Last reviewed: 2026-07-29 β“˜

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: Population patterns (Observational)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

1 support 1 contradict 0 tested null 6 mixed Β· 8 sources, 1 independent group

What the evidence shows

One well-conducted fertility-clinic cohort found men eating the most high-residue produce had 49% lower total sperm count and 32% lower normal morphology. Three things qualify it heavily. No independent research group has ever replicated the finding. The same group's other population, healthy young men rather than fertility patients, came back null.

The evidence (9)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Madej D, Granda D, Sicinska E, Kaluza J
2021 Β· Frontiers in nutrition
observational mixed low DIETARY route, cross-sectional, 90 healthy men aged 18-40 (3-day food record; total fruit/vegetable intake, NOT pesticide-residue-classified) -- INDEPENDENT of the Harvard Chan/EARTH lineage. Highest FV-intake quartile (>734 g/day) had the
Wang Z, Fu K, Zhang X, Chen G, Zheng L, Liang Y, Deng WJ, Sun H, Xu Z, Lin H, Hong H
2025 Β· Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
observational mixed low MIXED/biomonitored route (plasma pesticide + PAH + metal levels, not a clean dietary high/low-residue classification), reproductive-age men in Jinhua, China -- INDEPENDENT of the Harvard Chan/EARTH lineage. Tea and fruit intake were linked
Kazemi M, Salas-Huetos A, Mitsunami M, Chiu YH, Hauser R, Souter I, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Chavarro JE, EARTH Study Team
2025 Β· The American journal of clinical nutrition
observational mixed moderate DIETARY route, male partners in a fertility-clinic prospective cohort (EARTH Study, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Chan -- SAME lineage as the anchor; n=244 men / 437 ART cycles, 2007-2021; USDA Pesticide Data Program surveillance c
Liu YS, Zhang YX, Wang XB, Wu QJ, Liu FH, Pan BC, Zhao YH
2022 Β· Nutrients
observational mixed moderate DIETARY route, hospital-based case-control, China (552 asthenozoospermia cases vs 585 controls, validated FFQ; total/raw vegetable intake, NOT pesticide-residue-classified) -- INDEPENDENT of the Harvard Chan/EARTH lineage. Raw vegetable con
Smith-Spangler C, Brandeau ML, Hunter GE, Bavinger JC, Pearson M, Eschbach PJ, Sundaram V, Liu H, Schirmer P, Stave C, Olkin I, Bravata DM
2012 Β· Annals of internal medicine
observational mixed low DIETARY/population-comparison route (organic- vs conventional-food consumers -- NOT the USDA high/low-pesticide-residue FV classification the anchor uses). 2012 systematic review (17 human comparison studies total, only 3 with clinical outc
Chiu YH, Afeiche MC, Gaskins AJ, Williams PL, Petrozza JC, Tanrikut C, Hauser R, Chavarro JE
2015 Β· Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
observational supports moderate ANCHOR PAPER, FOUND ON RE-SWEEP. DIETARY route, EARTH Study (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health / Massachusetts General Hospital fertility clinic), male partners of subfertile couples (n=155 men, 338 semen samples, 2007-2012
Chiu YH, Gaskins AJ, Williams PL, Mendiola J, Jørgensen N, Levine H, Hauser R, Swan SH, Chavarro JE
2016 Β· The Journal of nutrition
observational contradicts moderate Chiu 2016 Rochester Young Men's Study, cross-sectional n=189 healthy men 18-22, same Harvard group and USDA-PDP residue score as the anchor clinic cohort: 'the intake of fruit and vegetables with high pesticide residues was unrelated to semen quality' (no estimate in abstract). Low-to-moderate-residue produce was associated with higher sperm count (top vs bottom quartile +169%, 95% CI 45%-400%), a different exposure. Null on the claim's exposure = contradicts. Exposure inferred from FFQ, not measured. [abstract-grade]
d10-54844-prm-2026-1231
2026 Β· Placenta and Reproductive Medicine
observational supports low Narrative review (no new primary data, no independent cohort of its own) states that pesticide residues in conventionally grown produce 'may attenuate the benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption via oxidative stress and androgen recepto
d10-26258-heal-hua-7802
2026 Β· Harokopio University
observational mixed low DIETARY route, men from 244 subfertile Greek couples undergoing IVF (Harokopio University undergraduate thesis -- INDEPENDENT of the Harvard Chan/EARTH lineage, but uses a semi-quantitative FFQ on total fruit/vegetable intake, NOT pesticide

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

πŸ“š Suggest a study βš‘ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account β€” we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.