← All claims

Longevity & Aging

aging decreases cellular NAD+

In plain terms: Does NAD+, a key cellular energy molecule, fall with age?

Leans support Longevity & Aging 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: • Aging

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.53

Yes, agreed across many labs, though it's an observed link and the human drop varies by tissue.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-14

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: Population patterns (Observational)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

9 support 0 contradict 4 tested null 2 mixed · 15 sources, 9 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Tissue/blood NAD+ falls with age across multiple independent labs - one of Sinclair's better-evidenced premises, though the human magnitude is heterogeneous and tissue-specific (more robust in rodents).

The evidence (15)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Migliavacca
2019 · Nat Commun
observational mixed moderate Muscle NAD+ biosynthesis (NAMPT) and mitochondrial capacity reduced in human sarcopenia across three independent cohorts (n=119)
Benjamin
2024 · Nutrients
observational supports low Reviews NMN trials; notes age-related NAD+ decline is real but human magnitude is variable and inconsistently measured
Yusri
2025 · npj Metab Health Dis
observational supports low Review synthesizing multi-lab evidence that tissue NAD+ metabolism declines with age and modulates mitochondrial function
Zhu
2018 · Front Aging Neurosci
observational supports low In-vivo 31P-MRS finds intracellular NAD+ and NAD+/NADH redox decline in the aging human brain
Katsyuba
2018 · Nature
animal tested-null moderate De novo NAD+ synthesis (ACMSD inhibition) raises NAD+ and improves mitochondrial function - supports functional importance of declining NAD+
Chini
2020 · Nat Metab
animal supports moderate CD38 ecto-enzyme rises in aging immune cells and drives age-related NAD+ and NMN decline - mechanism for tissue NAD+ fall
Tran
2022 · JAIDS
observational supports low [FT-verified] JAIDS 2022 muscle NAD decline driven by HIV/HCV/CMV NOT age; tangential confounded-by-infection
Roichman
2021 · Nat Commun
animal supports moderate SIRT6 over-expression restores NAD+-linked energy homeostasis and extends healthy lifespan in mice - supports declining NAD+ economy with age
Cuenoud
2020 · Front Aging Neurosci
observational tested-null low In-vivo 31P-MRS shows brain NAD declines and tracks ATP production in humans - independent human measurement of NAD decline
Oblong
2020 · Aging Cell
observational tested-null low Aging human skin shows declining mitochondrial/metabolic output; nicotinamide restores integrity - consistent with cutaneous NAD+ decline
Bertoldo
2020 · Cell Rep
animal supports moderate Oocyte NAD+ falls with reproductive aging in mice; NAD+ repletion rescues fertility - tissue-specific age decline
de Picciotto
2016 · Aging Cell
animal tested-null moderate NMN supplementation reverses age-associated vascular dysfunction in mice, consistent with an age-related NAD+ deficit
Elhassan
2019 · Cell Rep
RCT mixed low [FT-verified] Elhassan 2019 NR RCT raises muscle NAD+ but human age-decline data sparse; indirect
Chubanava
2023 · Exp Gerontol
mechanism supports low [FT-verified] Chubanava 2023 REVIEW citing PRECLINICAL NAD decline not observational; regrade->mechanism ANIMAL-derived
Massudi
2012 · PLoS ONE
observational supports moderate [FT-verified] Massudi 2012 direct human tissue NAD+ neg correlated with age + PARP/oxidative link

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.