← All claims

Food Contaminants

pesticide exposure increases Parkinson's disease risk

In plain terms: Do pesticides cause Parkinson's disease?

Leans support Food Contaminants 💰 Industry COI noted

Part of: 🔍 pesticides in food

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.44

For farm workers and people living near sprayed fields, this is one of the more credible pesticide risks, particularly for paraquat. But no study has ever linked it to the residue levels on supermarket food.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-29

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

3 support 0 contradict 0 tested null 9 mixed · 12 sources, 3 independent groups

What the evidence shows

One of the better-supported claims in this hub, and it is not about food. The signal is occupational and residential: farmworkers, applicators, and people living near sprayed fields. Paraquat and rotenone carry the strongest case, both being dopaminergic neurotoxicants that damage mitochondrial Complex I, with pooled analyses reporting meaningfully elevated odds.

The evidence (12)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Vaccari C et al
2019 · Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews
meta-analysis mixed moderate 2019 systematic review/meta-analysis of 9 case-control studies (OCCUPATIONAL paraquat exposure, farmworkers/applicators): PD occurrence 25% higher in exposed vs unexposed (pooled estimate; abstract gives no numeric CI). The single cohort st
Kamel F et al
2014 · Parkinsonism & related disorders
observational supports moderate Nested case-control in the Agricultural Health Study (OCCUPATIONAL cohort of pesticide applicators/spouses; NIH-funded; 89 PD cases, 336 controls): paraquat OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.5-12) in low-PUFA-diet individuals vs 1.2 (0.4-3.4) in high-PUFA i
Tsalenchuk M et al
2025 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL rotenone rat model (dose not specified in abstract): H3K27ac ChIP-seq and RNA-seq showed region-specific epigenomic changes despite uniform mitochondrial complex-I inhibition - a rotenone-induced immune/complement (C1q) TEMPERED: preclinical (animal/in-vitro) evidence, retained in the ledger but not carrying a human-outcome headline; dosing is typically far above human exposure.
Al Saeedy DY et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL dosing (far above human dietary exposure): male Lewis rats given rotenone 3 mg/kg i.p. daily for 9 days developed cataleptic motor deficits plus striatal transcriptional dysregulation (Ddc, Angpt2, circadian genes Per3/A TEMPERED: preclinical (animal/in-vitro) evidence, retained in the ledger but not carrying a human-outcome headline; dosing is typically far above human exposure.
da Silva PHP et al
2025 · preprint
meta-analysis supports moderate 2025 systematic review/meta-analysis of 124 human studies (PubMed/EMBASE/Web of Science to Jul 2024): PD positively associated with any pesticide class and with herbicides overall. OCCUPATIONAL exposure was associated with PD for all pestic
Wood G.
2026 · MetaArXiv
observational mixed low 2026 narrative comparison of six regulators reviewing the SAME paraquat-PD evidence base (2003-2026) reaching opposite conclusions: California DPR (2024) acknowledged 'moderate to strong' associations in the newest meta-analyses yet still d
Joshi P et al
2025 · bioRxiv
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL dosing (far above dietary exposure): mice given rotenone 2.5 mg/kg/day i.p. for 21 days lost ~40% of substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons and developed motor/anxiety deficits by 4 weeks, but ALL deficits and neuronal de
Meerman JJ et al
2026 · study_type: in-vitro
in-vitro mixed low In-vitro human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells exposed to rotenone (plus dinoseb, endosulfan, mancozeb) at 0.1-100 uM across varied durations/frequencies: neurotoxic potency rose with exposure duration and, for rotenone/mancozeb, with time elap
Bergemann CM et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL dosing in C. elegans: a HIGH rotenone concentration that itself impaired parental (P0) health caused altered mitochondrial respiration and greater dopaminergic-neurodegeneration susceptibility in offspring (F1); a LOW co
Yang H et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL/in-vitro paraquat model: paraquat exposure induced neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration via microglia-driven conversion of astrocytes to a pro-inflammatory phenotype (PI3K/AKT-dependent); effects were rev TEMPERED: preclinical (animal/in-vitro) evidence, retained in the ledger but not carrying a human-outcome headline; dosing is typically far above human exposure.
Nakao S et al
2026 · study_type: observational
observational supports low Single case report: acute high-dose organophosphate poisoning (RESIDENTIAL/accidental exposure, pesticide found in the patient's home shed - not chronic low-level exposure) produced toxic parkinsonism confirmed serially by DAT-SPECT (progre
Gómez-Chavarín M et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL dosing, PRENATAL/early-life route: Wistar rats given rotenone 1 mg/kg/day during gestation/lactation vs. adult-onset (postnatal day 60-102) exposure - developmental exposure caused earlier, more severe, and more persiste TEMPERED: preclinical (animal/in-vitro) evidence, retained in the ledger but not carrying a human-outcome headline; dosing is typically far above human exposure.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.