← All claims

Supplements

quercetin decreases cancer risk

In plain terms: Does quercetin prevent cancer?

Contested Supplements 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: 🧪 quercetin

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.18

The evidence is scattered and site-by-site: a repeated hint for lung cancer, a clean null for ovarian, and for prostate the biggest analysis found MORE cancer, not less. None of it can separate quercetin from the fruit and vegetables that contain it.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-26 ⓘ

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

5 support 3 contradict 0 tested null 9 mixed · 17 sources, 7 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Loud evidence and relevant evidence are two different literatures here. The overwhelming majority of "quercetin anticancer" work is cell-line and rodent research that carries no implication for human risk. The human evidence is dietary-flavonol epidemiology, and it is scattered and site-inconsistent: the most repeated inverse association is lung cancer (OR ~0.66-0.

The evidence (21)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Xie Y, Huang S, Su Y
2016 · Nutrients
meta-analysis mixed moderate Meta-analysis of 12 human population studies (4,593 cases, 519,378 controls) found dietary flavonol intake associated with reduced gastric cancer risk (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91) but no significant association with esophageal cancer (OR 0.8
Amjadi A, Abbasi H, Tahavorgar A, Esfahanian M, Torkaman M, Shahrokhi Sardoo A, Erfanimanesh A, Shamsi-Goushki A, Akbari ME, Alhouei B, Gholamalizadeh M, Doaei S
2026 · Expert reviews in molecular medicine
meta-analysis supports moderate Umbrella review re-pooling meta-analyses (units are syntheses, rubric #690): 'Eligible studies included meta-analyses that examined polyphenol intake and DSC risk.' 'Data from six meta-analyses, encompassing 27 effect sizes, revealed a statistically significant 11% reduction in the risk of DSCs' (RR 0.89, 0.85-0.93); quercetin subgroup 22% lower, digestive cancers only. Review — zero weight.
Zamora-Ros R, Sacerdote C, Ricceri F, Weiderpass E, Roswall N, Buckland G, St-Jules DE, Overvad K, Kyrø C, Fagherazzi G, Kvaskoff M, Severi G, Chang-Claude J, Kaaks R, Nöthlings U, Trichopoulou A, Naska A, Trichopoulos D, Palli D, Grioni S, Mattiello A, Tumino R, Gram IT, Engeset D, Huerta JM, Molina-Montes E, Argüelles M, Amiano P, Ardanaz E, Ericson U, Lindkvist B, Nilsson LM, Kiemeney LA, Ros M, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Knaze V, Romieu I, Scalbert A, Brennan P, Wark P, Vineis P, Riboli E, González CA
2014 · British journal of cancer
observational supports moderate EPIC cohort (477,312 participants across 10 European countries, 1,575 incident bladder cancer cases, ~11y follow-up) found dietary flavonol intake inversely associated with bladder cancer risk (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.91, top vs. bottom quin
Zhou Y, Gu K, Zhou F
2023 · Nutrients
observational supports low NHANES population-based cohort (14,029 participants, 405 cancer deaths over ~117 months) found dietary flavonol intake inversely associated with all-cause cancer mortality across quartiles vs. lowest (HR ~0.54-0.58, p=0.02-0.05), with effec
Duan X, Zhang L, Liu F
2025 · Frontiers in pharmacology
animal mixed low Meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies found quercetin treatment reduced tumor/precancerous lesion markers and cell proliferation (PCNA SMD -8.22) in rodent colorectal-cancer models. The authors themselves note human clinical research TEMPERED: preclinical (cell-line/animal) work — carries no implication for human cancer RISK, which is what this claim asserts.
Kubina R, Iriti M, Kabała-Dzik A
2021 · Nutrients
in-vitro mixed low Systematic review of PRECLINICAL (in-vitro/animal) studies only, on quercetin/fisetin/kaempferol's antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity in head & neck cancer cell lines and signaling pathways. No human dietary-intake or risk data pre TEMPERED: preclinical (cell-line/animal) work — carries no implication for human cancer RISK, which is what this claim asserts.
Chang H, Lei L, Zhou Y, Ye F, Zhao G
2018 · Nutrients
meta-analysis supports moderate Meta-analysis of 12 studies (5 cohort, 7 case-control; 17,481 cases/740,859 controls): highest vs lowest flavonol intake (class including quercetin) OR=0.70 (0.54-0.90) for colon cancer, but no significant effect on rectal cancer (OR=0.93
Yi G, Liu Y, Li G, Chang K
2026 · Molecules
in-vitro mixed low Narrative review: 'This narrative review was conceptualized with reference to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines'. Content is preclinical: quercetin 'exhibits pleiotropic anti-cancer activities in preclinical models'; no human risk data. Review — zero weight.
Rostampour K, Alipour K, Mirjalili F, Forootani B, Yekrang Safakar H, Beigrezaei S, Forbes SC, Salehi-Abargouei A
2025 · Nutrition and cancer
meta-analysis supports moderate GRADE-assessed meta-analysis of 20 observational studies: quercetin intake OR=0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.91, p=0.01) for lung cancer, alongside similar inverse signals for other flavonoid subclasses. Dietary-intake design cannot isolate quercetin
Huang Y, Wang W, Jin J
2024 · Frontiers in nutrition
meta-analysis contradicts moderate Meta-analysis of 38 human observational studies (11 cohort, 27 case-control; n=824,933) found dietary flavonol intake associated with a small but statistically significant INCREASE in prostate cancer risk (OR 1.05, p=0.042), opposite to the
El-Mansy MN, Hamdy ZM, Abdelsamie AE, El-Borady OM
2026 · Nanoscale advances
animal mixed low Hamster DMBA-induced oral carcinogenesis model: oral quercetin (25 mg/kg, 3x/week) reduced Ki-67/Bcl-2 expression and carcinoma severity versus DMBA-only controls. Animal chemoprevention model at pharmacologic dose, not a human dietary-inta TEMPERED: preclinical (cell-line/animal) work — carries no implication for human cancer RISK, which is what this claim asserts.
Wang K, Lu T, Yang R, Zhou S
2024 · Nutrients
observational supports low NHANES cohort of 6,110 hypertensive US adults (43,977 person-years, 265 cancer deaths) found higher flavonol intake associated with lower cancer-related mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96), while total-flavonoid intake alone showed no sig
Bandera EV, Williams MG, Sima C, Bayuga S, Pulick K, Wilcox H, Soslow R, Zauber AG, Olson SH
2009 · Cancer causes & control : CCC
observational mixed low Case-control study (424 endometrial cancer cases, 398 controls): quercetin intake showed a borderline inverse association (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.01, highest vs lowest quartile, p-trend=0.02). Confidence interval crosses the null; small cas
Gates MA, Vitonis AF, Tworoger SS, Rosner B, Titus-Ernstoff L, Hankinson SE, Cramer DW
2009 · International journal of cancer
observational contradicts moderate Large case-control study (1,141 ovarian cancer cases, 1,183 controls) testing 5 individual flavonoids: quercetin intake showed no significant association with ovarian cancer risk; only apigenin showed a borderline inverse association (RR=0.
Li H, Zeng Y, Zi J, Hu Y, Ma G, Wang X, Shan S, Cheng G, Xiong J
2024 · Mol Nutr Food Res
meta-analysis mixed low Umbrella review of syntheses: 'an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews is conducted' (32 articles); exposures are total flavonoids and subclasses ('flavonol and gastric cancer'), no quercetin-specific estimate. Review — zero weight.
Simons CC, Hughes LA, Arts IC, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Weijenberg MP
2009 · International journal of cancer
observational contradicts moderate Netherlands Cohort Study (120,852 participants, ~2,485 colorectal cancer cases, 13.3y follow-up) found NO overall association between dietary flavonol, flavone, or catechin intake and colorectal cancer endpoints. A protective catechin (not
Shahid B, Sultan MT, Noman AM, Yehuala TF, Nafees I, Maaz M, Fatima A, Amjad A, Raza H
2026 · Discover oncology
in-vitro mixed low Systematic review of 24 preclinical studies (16 in vitro cell-line, 8 in vivo animal) found quercetin/kaempferol reduced cancer cell viability and induced apoptosis in lung, breast, and colorectal models via PI3K/Akt, MAPK, NF-kB, and p53 p TEMPERED: preclinical (cell-line/animal) work — carries no implication for human cancer RISK, which is what this claim asserts.
Wang Z, Huang J, Huang D, An R, Tong G, Yuan W, Liao M, Zhong Q
2026 · PloS one
animal mixed low In vitro HCC cell lines plus mouse xenograft model: quercetin dose-dependently suppressed EGFR/PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signaling and reduced HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma tumor growth. Preclinical mechanism/xenograft study at experimental TEMPERED: preclinical (cell-line/animal) work — carries no implication for human cancer RISK, which is what this claim asserts.
Woo HD, Kim J
2013 · PloS one
meta-analysis mixed moderate Meta-analysis of 35 studies (19 case-control, 15 cohort; ~1M subjects total) found dietary quercetin (and kaempferol) intake significantly associated with decreased smoking-related cancer risk (aerodigestive tract/lung) only in smokers, wit
Parvaresh A, Razavi R, Rafie N, Ghiasvand R, Pourmasoumi M, Miraghajani M
2016 · Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
observational contradicts low Narrative systematic review (13 total studies: only 1 prospective + 2 case-control in humans, rest animal/in-vitro) concluded epidemiological data did NOT show quercetin significantly decreases ovarian cancer risk at typical dietary intake
Reale G, Russo GI, Di Mauro M, Regis F, Campisi D, Giudice AL, Marranzano M, Ragusa R, Castelli T, Cimino S, Morgia G
2018 · Complementary therapies in medicine
observational mixed low Case-control study (118 prostate cancer cases, 222 controls, Sicily): high flavonol intake OR=0.19 (0.06-0.56) and catechin intake OR=0.12 (0.04-0.36) associated with reduced prostate cancer risk; flavanones were positively associated with TEMPERED: small (118-case) recall-bias-prone case-control whose protective prostate finding directly contradicts the far larger prostate meta-analysis; a genuine disagreement, not support.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.