← All claims

Supplements · Metabolic & Cardiometabolic

quercetin decreases LDL cholesterol

In plain terms: Does quercetin lower LDL cholesterol?

Contested Supplements 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: 🧪 quercetin

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score -0.12

The two largest reviews of the trials (17 studies and 5 studies) both found no change at all. The one review showing a drop covered only people with metabolic syndrome and disagreed with itself so much the result is hard to trust.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-26 ⓘ

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

4 support 4 contradict 0 tested null 3 mixed · 11 sources, 8 independent groups

What the evidence shows

The two largest human syntheses find NOTHING. A meta-analysis of 17 RCTs (896 participants) and another of 5 RCTs (442) both report no significant LDL-C change. The one meta-analysis showing a drop is restricted to metabolic-syndrome patients and carries near-total heterogeneity (I2 = 92.

The evidence (11)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Badiee MS, Vadizadeh A, Salehcheh M, Moosavi M, Fakhredini F, Kalantar H, Rafiei Asl S, Khodayar MJ
2025 · Avicenna journal of phytomedicine
animal supports low High-fat-diet mice (n=6/group, 43 days): quercetin 50 mg/kg (alone and combined with Camellia sinensis leaf extract) reduced serum LDL cholesterol along with total cholesterol/triglycerides and raised HDL-C. Abstract pools the QCT-alone and
Sahebkar A
2017 · Critical reviews in food science and nutrition
meta-analysis contradicts moderate Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (n=442; population not disease-restricted in abstract): LDL-C unchanged (WMD +1.43 mg/dL, 95%CI -0.92 to 3.78, p=0.23). Even the high-dose (≥500 mg/d, ≥4 wk) subgroup left LDL-C unchanged (total cholesterol rose slig
Onaolapo A et al
2026 · Research Square
animal mixed low Wistar rats (n=6/group) on a high-fat/high-sugar diet for an unspecified duration; HFHS feeding raised LDL, TC, TG and other markers, and quercetin 100 or 200 mg/kg significantly ameliorated (lowered) LDL along with TC/TG/glucose/insulin, c TEMPERED: unreviewed rat preprint; cannot carry a human LDL claim.
Tabrizi R, Tamtaji OR, Mirhosseini N, Lankarani KB, Akbari M, Heydari ST, Dadgostar E, Asemi Z
2020 · Critical reviews in food science and nutrition
meta-analysis supports low Meta-analysis of 16 RCTs in metabolic syndrome / related-disorder patients: quercetin significantly reduced LDL-C (SMD=-0.88, 95%CI -1.35 to -0.41, p<0.001), total cholesterol, and CRP. Heterogeneity was very high (I2=92.7% for LDL-C) and t
Huang H, Liao D, Dong Y, Pu R
2020 · Nutrition reviews
meta-analysis contradicts moderate Meta-analysis of 17 RCTs (n=896; general/mixed adult population, no disease restriction stated in abstract): quercetin significantly lowered SBP (-3.09 mmHg) and DBP (-2.86 mmHg) but did not change plasma lipid profiles or glucose overall.
Abdullah N, Liba AN, Hambali KA, Nordin ML, Ibrahim NI, Harafinova HS, Azzubaidi MSA, Siti HN
2025 · The Medical journal of Malaysia
animal supports low Diet-induced dyslipidemic rabbits (n=4-5/group): quercetin 20 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks reduced total and LDL cholesterol (p<0.05), comparable to atorvastatin 0.43 mg/kg/day, with no effect on HDL or inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, bradykinin
Jin D, Jin S, Zhou T, Sheng G, Gao P, Li G
2025 · Food science & nutrition
meta-analysis supports moderate Systematic review/meta-analysis of 7 RCTs, 540 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD); quercetin significantly reduced LDL alongside total cholesterol and triglycerides and raised HDL (weighted mean d
Jingjing Z, Zixin C, Hang Q
2026 · Journal of health, population, and nutrition
animal contradicts moderate Meta-analysis of 17 studies in animal models of hyperuricemia found quercetin significantly reduced TG and VLDL (p<0.05) but had NO significant effect on LDL-C (p>0.05) — an explicit clean null on this exact endpoint, though authors flag hi
Guo W, Gong X, Li M
2019 · Current pharmaceutical design
meta-analysis mixed low Meta-analysis of 9 RCTs in overweight/obese adults: LDL-C unchanged overall (SMD -0.02, 95%CI -0.15 to 0.11), but a post-hoc dose subgroup (≥250 mg/day, total dose ≥14,000 mg) showed a significant LDL-C reduction (SMD -0.58, 95%CI -0.94 to
Chen D, Wang J, Lei Z, Qu L, Zou W
2026 · International journal of molecular sciences
animal mixed moderate Preclinical systematic review/meta-analysis, 22 studies, 421 animals (atherosclerosis models); quercetin lowered TC, TG, and LDL-C and raised HDL-C vs control, with best effects at 25-100 mg/kg over an 8-10-week intervention window. No abso TEMPERED: rodent atherosclerosis models cannot carry a human LDL claim above the single disease-restricted human meta-analysis behind it.
Ajayi AF, Oluwole DT, Hamed MA, Jegede AJ, Adisa FB, Okeleji LO, Iyiola TO, Akano OP
2026 · Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology
animal contradicts low Male Wistar rats (n=5/group), quercetin 50 mg/kg/day alone for 60 days did not alter baseline lipid parameters vs control, but markedly attenuated MDMA (10 mg/kg/day)-induced dyslipidemia (TC/TG/HDL/LDL) alongside cardiac injury and oxidati RESTANCED: the abstract states quercetin alone did NOT alter baseline lipids — a null on this directional claim is disconfirming, not supporting (CONVENTIONS §5).

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.