← All claims

Supplements

quercetin treats allergic rhinitis

In plain terms: Does quercetin relieve hay fever and allergy symptoms?

Insufficient Supplements

Part of: 🧪 quercetin

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.19
⚖️ Thin evidence — read the needle loosely. The score shows which way the studies lean, but there are too few independent, high-quality ones to place it firmly. Expect this to move as better evidence arrives.

Mostly for itchy eyes, not a blocked nose. Only three small trials exist, all using absorption-enhanced forms, and two of the three found no real benefit for nasal symptoms, the thing most people actually want relieved.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-26

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: Human trials (RCT / n-of-1)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

2 support 0 contradict 0 tested null 14 mixed · 16 sources, 2 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Narrow, formulation-dependent, and weakest exactly where it matters. Only three genuine human RCTs exist, all small (n=20-66), all in Japanese cedar-pollinosis cohorts, and all using ABSORPTION-ENHANCED forms — phospholipid phytosome or EMIQ. Plain quercetin has never been tested in humans for this.

The evidence (16)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Luo M et al
2026 · study_type: in-vitro
in-vitro mixed low Formulation: plain quercetin (unspecified purity), tested in human nasal epithelial cells stimulated with house-dust-mite extract in vitro, plus network-pharmacology/docking (not a human trial). Quercetin reduced HDM-induced ALOX5/LTB4 expr TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Cheng J et al
2022 · study_type: in-vitro
in-vitro mixed low Formulation: plain quercetin, tested in vitro on LPS-stimulated human nasal epithelial cells (HNEpC) at 10-200 uM for 24h. Quercetin reversed LPS-induced apoptosis and inflammatory cytokine release via the miR-21/DMBT1/NF-kB axis; mechanism TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Kawai M et al
2009 · study_type: RCT
RCT mixed low RCT (n=20 cedar-pollinosis patients) of EMIQ (enzymatically-modified isoquercitrin, a bioavailable quercetin-glycoside form; 100 mg BID = 200 mg/day) for 8 weeks found significantly lower ocular/ocular-itching scores (p<0.05) but nasal symp
Lv Z et al
2025 · study_type: animal
animal mixed moderate Preclinical systematic review/meta-analysis of 13 murine/rat allergy-model studies (plain quercetin, doses/formulation not detailed) found quercetin significantly reduced IgE, histamine, eosinophil/macrophage infiltration and IL-4/TNF-α whi TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Naso M et al
2025 · study_type: observational
observational mixed low Narrative review states that despite abundant in vitro/murine AR-model evidence, only TWO human trials have tested quercetin as monotherapy for allergic disease — both reported positive symptom/QoL results — and proposes a new quercetin-pho TEMPERED: narrative review whose own finding is that only TWO human trials exist — that is a statement about scarcity, not corroboration.
Hirano T et al
2009 · study_type: RCT
RCT mixed low RCT (n=24 cedar-pollinosis patients) of EMIQ (100 mg/day) for 8 weeks, started preventatively 4 weeks pre-season, found significantly lower ocular symptom+medication scores in some weeks but explicitly NO significant difference in nasal sym
Otaki A et al
2023 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low Formulation: plain oral quercetin, >25 mg/kg/day for 5 days, in a TDI-sensitized rat allergic-rhinitis model, plus in-vitro TNF-stimulated human nasal epithelial cells (effective only at >5.0 uM; <2.5 uM inactive). Oral quercetin raised ant TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Kang C et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed moderate OVA-induced allergic-rhinitis mouse model (plain quercetin by gavage, dose not stated in abstract, dexamethasone comparator) found quercetin lowered allergic symptom scores and serum OVA-IgE/IL-4/IL-13/IL-1β/IL-17 while raising IL-10, via T TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Lai YR et al
2025 · study_type: meta-analysis
meta-analysis mixed low Meta-analysis of 13 human RCTs (n=823) of polyphenolic compounds (catechins and/or quercetin, not isolated per-compound) found reduced total nasal symptom score, sneezing, and nasal itching in seasonal AR (SMD 0.5-0.75) but no significant Q
Kang C et al
2023 · Research Square
animal mixed low Formulation: plain oral quercetin (dose not specified in abstract) vs. dexamethasone, gavage, in an OVA-induced mouse AR model; UNPUBLISHED PREPRINT, not peer-reviewed. Quercetin reduced OVA-induced allergic symptom scores and serum IgE/IL- TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Pellow J et al
2020 · study_type: observational
observational supports low Mixed-methods systematic review of AR supplements (48 RCTs, 10 observational) lists isoquercitrin (a quercetin glycoside, not plain quercetin) as one of several single supplements with 'promising evidence,' and a vitamin-D3+quercetin+Perill
Deng Y et al
2025 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low Formulation: plain isolated quercetin (QUE) vs. the Huangqi-Gancao herbal decoction (HQD); dose/route not stated in abstract; tested in an OVA-induced mouse AR model alongside network-pharmacology/docking (identified QUE as the herb pair's TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Xiao Y et al
2026 · study_type: animal
animal mixed moderate OVA-induced mouse AR model plus in vitro IL-33-stimulated mast cell (RBL-2H3) assays; plain quercetin suppressed IL-33-driven degranulation/cytokine release in vitro and, in vivo, alleviated AR symptom scores, reduced Th2 cytokines/OVA-IgE/ TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Yamada S et al
2022 · study_type: RCT
RCT supports moderate RCT (n=66 Japanese adults with pollinosis) of Quercetin phytosome® (phospholipid-complexed, bioavailability-enhanced formulation; 200 mg/day) for 4 weeks found significant improvement vs placebo in JRQLQ scores (eye itching, sneezing, nasal
Ke X et al
2023 · study_type: animal
animal mixed low Formulation: plain oral quercetin, 20/35/50 mg/kg/day, in an ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis mouse model (duration not stated). Quercetin reduced nasal rubbing/sneezing (nasal symptoms), serum IgE/IgG1/histamine and Th17-skewed cytokine TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.
Mu D et al
2024 · study_type: animal
animal mixed moderate OVA-type AR mouse model treated with quercetin-chitosan nasal nanoparticles (~229 nm, 79.6% encapsulation) — a nasal nanoparticle delivery form, not oral/systemic quercetin — significantly reduced sneezing and nasal-rubbing events and lower TEMPERED: rodent OVA/TDI model or nasal-cell assay — tests the mechanism, not human symptom relief, which is what this claim asserts.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.