Supplements
riboflavin decreases homocysteine
π Last reviewed: 2026-07-15 β
Evidence ladder
How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."
Top evidence so far: Human trials (RCT / n-of-1)
How the studies fall
What the evidence shows
Riboflavin (~1.6 mg/d) lowers homocysteine and systolic blood pressure specifically in MTHFR 677TT homozygotes (riboflavin is the MTHFR enzyme's FAD cofactor).
The evidence (4)
| Source | Grade | Stance | Quality | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rooney M, Bottiglieri T, Wasek-Patterson B, McMahon A, Hughes CF, McCann A, Horigan G, Strain JJ, McNulty H, Ward M 2020 Β· Biochimie | RCT | supports | moderate | Secondary analysis of stored plasma from prior Ulster BP-lowering RCTs (abstract-grade). Riboflavin 1.6 mg/d (n 24) vs placebo (n 23), 16 wk, MTHFR 677TT adults: 'In response to riboflavin, SAM (P = 0.008) and cystathionine (P = 0.045) concentrations increased, with no responses in other one-carbon metabolites observed.' The LC-MS/MS panel was methionine, SAM, SAH, betaine, choline, cystathionine; no homocysteine response to riboflavin is reported in the abstract (full text could show a null, which would be contradicts - cannot-tell from available text). Homocysteine appears only cross-sectionally: 'plasma homocysteine was higher (P = 0.043) in TT, compared to CC individuals' (n 115). Population drawn from the RCTs already counted here (Horigan 2010 / Wilson 2013 lineage), same McNulty/Ulster group. |
| jingo-2020 2020 Β· BMC medicine | observational | tested-null | moderate | Riboflavin status modulates 677TT hypertension risk across adulthood. |
| horigan-2010 2010 Β· Journal of hypertension | RCT | supports | moderate | Riboflavin lowered systolic BP ~13 mmHg in 677TT (none in CC/CT). |
| wilson-2013 2013 Β· Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) | RCT | supports | moderate | SBP -5.6 mmHg on top of antihypertensives in 677TT (P=0.033). |
Disagree, or know a study we missed?
We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.
Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account β we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).
Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.