← All claims

Longevity & Aging · Metabolic & Cardiometabolic

testosterone replacement therapy is-non-inferior-to-placebo-for major adverse cardiac events in older men with CV risk

In plain terms: Is testosterone therapy safe for the heart in older at-risk men?

Strong support Longevity & Aging 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: 💊 Testosterone therapy (TRT)

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.67

The large TRAVERSE RCT found TRT non-inferior to placebo for major cardiac events over about 3 years, though it raised atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, and acute kidney injury and does not speak to longer horizons.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-07-14

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

8 support 2 contradict 1 tested null 2 mixed · 13 sources, 10 independent groups

The evidence (13)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Pencina
2025 · J Endocr Soc
RCT supports moderate TRAVERSE analysis found no adverse interaction between TRT and COVID-19 on cardiovascular-relevant outcomes, consistent with overall CV safety.
Tadisina S
2026 · Andrology
observational contradicts low VA propensity-matched retrospective study (n=2518/arm) found TRT associated with higher new-onset hypertension (10.48% vs 6.04%), stroke (1.43% vs 0.52%), CAD (2.26% vs 1.51%), and markedly higher all-cause mortality (10.13% vs 1.
Szarpak
2026 · Pol Heart J
RCT mixed moderate Confirms TRAVERSE MACE non-inferiority but highlights higher rates of atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, and pulmonary embolism in the T arm — safety is not unqualified.
Krishnan
2024 · Prog Cardiovasc Dis
observational mixed moderate Narrative review notes TRAVERSE showed no excess MACE but flags low-normal dosing, high dropout, short follow-up and TTrials non-calcified plaque signal as caveats.
Hackett
2025 · World J Mens Health
observational supports moderate TRAVERSE: 5,246 hypogonadal men (T less than 10.4 nmol/L) with high CV risk, transdermal T gel vs placebo, mean 27 months — no increase in MACE (primary composite non-inferior) and no excess prostate events.
Bhasin
2024 · JAMA Intern Med
RCT supports high TRAVERSE substudy found testosterone did not raise cardiovascular risk and did not worsen glycemia in men with prediabetes/diabetes.
Weber
2025 · Andrology
observational contradicts moderate Ambulatory BP study found T gel raises systolic BP — the basis for FDA's 2025 class-wide blood-pressure warning; a real residual CV-relevant signal.
Jaiswal
2024 · Prog Cardiovasc Dis
meta-analysis supports moderate Meta-analysis of 30 RCTs found no significant increase in cardiovascular events with testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men.
Yeap
2026 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab
observational supports moderate Independent narrative synthesis: TRAVERSE (mean 3-yr follow-up) shows no MACE excess, but calls follow-up short and says long-term CV safety still needs confirmation.
Zitzmann
2026 · Andrology
observational supports moderate European expert-panel synthesis of TRAVERSE plus other RCTs and meta-analyses concludes TRT does not increase MACE in hypogonadal men.
Haider SH
2024 · Future Sci OA
meta-analysis supports low Systematic review/meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies (search through June 2023) found no association between TRT and carotid intima-media thickness or other atherosclerosis markers, concluding TRT allows safe usage in
Bernstein JS
2024 · Ther Adv Urol
observational tested-null low Single-arm phase III 6-month trial of oral testosterone undecanoate (n=155) reported no drug-related serious adverse events, only one adverse drug reaction (hypertension, in >=2% of participants), and a modest 1.7 mmHg rise in sys
Siltari
2023 · Acta Oncol
observational supports moderate Finnish cohort found TRT not associated with increased cardiovascular-specific mortality.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.