← All claims

Supplements

vitamin D treats fibromyalgia

Leans support Supplements
RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.22

πŸ“… Last reviewed: 2026-07-15 β“˜

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

2 support 0 contradict 0 tested null 3 mixed Β· 5 sources, 2 independent groups Β· 1 superseded β€” pooled inside a review, counted once

What the evidence shows

Vitamin D supplementation reduces fibromyalgia pain, especially in deficient patients.

The evidence (6)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Ilari S, et al.
2025 Β· Nutrients
meta-analysis supports low Vitamin D supplementation reduces FM pain vs control, especially in deficient patients.
Lozano-Plata LI, et al.
2021 Β· Clin Rheumatol
RCT mixed moderate RCT (12-wk weekly vit D in FM): modest/null-leaning effect on pain β€” mixed result.
Wepner F, et al.
2014 Β· Pain
RCT supports moderate RCT (n=30): vitamin D optimization (target 32-48 ng/mL) significantly reduced VAS pain vs placebo.
Ersoy S, Kesiktas FN, Sirin B, Bugdayci D, Paker N
2024 Β· Ir J Med Sci
observational mixed low DESIGN MISMATCH: titled 'the effect of vitamin D treatment' but the methods describe a CROSS-SECTIONAL study of 180 female fibromyalgia patients - not an interventional trial. Graded observational/low on that basis; cannot support a treatment-effect claim.
mirzaei-2018-vitd
2018
RCT supports moderate RCT: vitamin D vs control improved quality-of-life outcomes in FM.
↩ SUPERSEDED β€” pooled in the review above, counted once
Qu K, Li MX, Zhou YL, Yu P, Dong M
2022 Β· Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol
meta-analysis mixed moderate Independent MA of 5 RCTs (n=315): Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire improved (WMD -7.82, 95% CI -12.05 to -3.59, p<0.001) BUT pain VAS showed NO significant difference (WMD -0.60, 95% CI -1.38 to 0.17, p>0.05). Benefit on the function questionnaire, not on pain itself - graded mixed for that split.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

πŸ“š Suggest a study βš‘ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account β€” we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.