← All influencers

Dr. Paul Saladino

MD (psychiatry) · 'Carnivore Code' / animal-based advocate

Every one of his distinctive claims — that plant antinutrients and polyphenols net-harm humans, that dietary fibre is useless, that oxalates broadly cause disease in normal people — is contradicted or heavily qualified by independent, higher-tier evidence (large cohorts, meta-analyses, umbrella reviews showing plant foods track with lower mortality). Notable self-correction: around 2023 he abandoned strict carnivore and re-added fruit, honey and raw dairy, conceding humans need carbohydrate — undercutting the thesis that made him famous.

Evidence vs. their claims

Across 2 testable claims, where the weight of independent evidence lands — on their side, or against them. Their own research network is excluded as evidence.

2
0 evidence backs them2 evidence against them0 unsettled

Read relative to their stance: when they dispute a claim and the evidence supports that claim, it counts as against them. Each row shows their stance, so you can see which way the evidence cuts.

Conflicts of interest

Stated factually. Conflicts do not by themselves make a claim wrong; they are context for weighing it.

Claim-by-claim (2)

Grouped by health topic. A person's claims often span several areas — here's where each one lands.

Educational only, not medical advice. Verdicts grade the evidence, not the person; see the methodology.