← All influencers

Dr. David Sinclair

Harvard geneticist · longevity communicator

First-rate molecular biologist; the critique is presenting mouse/mechanism findings as human-actionable.

Evidence vs. their claims

Across 14 testable claims, where the weight of independent evidence lands — on their side, or against them. Their own research network is excluded as evidence.

8
4
2
8 evidence backs them4 evidence against them2 unsettled

Read relative to their stance: when they dispute a claim and the evidence supports that claim, it counts as against them. Each row shows their stance, so you can see which way the evidence cuts.

Conflicts of interest

Stated factually. Conflicts do not by themselves make a claim wrong; they are context for weighing it.

Claim-by-claim (14)

Grouped by health topic. A person's claims often span several areas — here's where each one lands.

Educational only, not medical advice. Verdicts grade the evidence, not the person; see the methodology.